Can AI do critical control point monitoring (HACCP)?
An expert breakdown of a typical process from public sources, worked out by the same rules as your own check.
0 of 7 steps go to an agent
Goes to an agent (0)
An agent does these steps on its own.
No steps here.
AI drafts, a person checks (5)
AI prepares the work; a person reviews and confirms it.
Record the result in the CCP log
A person signs off: the law or a regulator holds someone accountable for it.
Check against the critical limit, establish the deviation
A person signs off: the law or a regulator holds someone accountable for it.
Establish the cause of the deviation
A person signs off: the law or a regulator holds someone accountable for it.
Document the corrective action
A person signs off: the law or a regulator holds someone accountable for it.
Keep the records and revise the HACCP plan when deviations recur
A person signs off: the law or a regulator holds someone accountable for it.
Stays with people (2)
These steps need a person's judgement or presence.
Decide the fate of the affected product
Stays with people: it takes judgement that depends on your business context.
- Judging risk or priority in a business context
Verification: instrument calibration and record review
Stays with people: someone has to be there in person.
- Instrumental reading of a value from an object
2 steps outside what AI can work on
Physical work, or nothing AI could apply itself to. These steps count in no figure.
Measure or observe at the CCP at the set frequency
Stays with people: someone has to be there in person.
- Instrumental reading of a value from an object
Stop the process and isolate the affected product
Stays with people: someone has to be there in person.
- Physical action on an object
Sources
- fda.gov · Regulator
- fao.org · Standard
- fsis.usda.gov · Regulator
What about your own process?
Describe it in your own words and get the same breakdown in about a minute.
Check your own process